News and Events

COVID vaccines can block variant hitting Asia, lab study finds

COVID-19

Subject: COVID vaccines can block variant hitting Asia, lab study finds

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01329-9

 

Gold-standard experiments on two COVID-19 vaccines suggest that they confer immunity against a subtype of the SARS-CoV-2 variant tearing through India. But the research also hints that this subtype is more resistant to antibodies than are other forms of the virus.

“These vaccines are working,” says Mehul Suthar, an immunologist at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, who led the research1. Still, the results underscore the need to continue monitoring vaccine response to SARS-CoV-2 mutations, which often affect the all-important spike protein that the virus uses to infect cells. “Because of the spectrum of mutations that have accumulated within the spike protein, the antibodies just don’t work as well,” says Suthar.

First detected in India last October, the variant B.1.617 was this year linked to a rapid rise in cases in a handful of Indian states and has now been found in more than 40 countries. The subtypes B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2 have both been detected with increasing frequency in India in the past few months; both carry two mutations linked to increased transmissibility. Because of their quick spread, scientists are keen to find out whether the various forms of B.1.617 undermine COVID-19 vaccines.

Other research has analysed how well the vaccine made by Pfizer in New York City and BioNTech in Mainz, Germany, fares against B.1.617. But that work did not use actual SARS-CoV-2; instead, it used other viruses engineered to have key mutations found in B.1.6172,3.

For their experiments, Suthar and his team used B.1.617.1 itself, making their assay a ‘gold standard’ test for vaccine efficacy. The researchers combined the virus with antibody-laden blood serum from people who had received either the Pfizer vaccine or that made by Moderna of Cambridge, Massachusetts, both based on mRNA. This allowed the team to study how well antibodies induced by vaccination could ‘neutralize’ the virus, or block it from infecting cells.

The team’s data show that antibodies generated by vaccination are seven times less effective at blocking B.1.617.1 than at neutralizing the coronavirus strain that circulated early in the pandemic. But antibodies from all 25 vaccinated people were able to neutralize B.1.617.1 to some extent.

“It’s pretty important work,” says Scott Weaver, a virologist at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. But he noted that the results offer one snapshot of immunity, which can change over time. For a full picture, Weaver says, “we need to test sera from people who have been vaccinated at various points in time in the past”.

The findings underscore the need to increase vaccination rates, Suthar says. “So long as there is a naive population out there, the virus is going to infect, replicate and mutate.”

The findings have not yet been peer reviewed.

 

Publication Date: 
05/24/2021

Estudio sobre el Covid-19

COVID-19

estudio

 

Comunidad Universitaria y Estudiantil

 

Saludos.  

Se comparte información sobre Estudio sobre el Covid-19 donde investigamos la influencia de estresores de la pandemia en el individuo y su respuesta al virus. Buscamos reclutar personas de entre 21-75 -años que hayan tenido Covid en algún momento.

 

Los interesados puedan brindar su información para nosotros comunicarnos con ellos ( https://forms.gle/E7NfSamGmbC1g3nZ8 )

 

Anuncia:  Decanato de Estudiantes
Informa: UPR Centro Comprensivo de Cáncer

 

 

Publication Date: 
05/06/2021

Updated Biographical Sketch and Other Support Format Pages Available Now and Required January 2022

rcmi

Updated Biographical Sketch and Other Support Format Pages Available Now and 

Required January 2022

By NIH Staff

Posted May 5, 2021

As announced in March, updated biosketch and other support format pages and instructions are available for use in applications, Just-in-Time (JIT) Reports, and Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPRs). Use of the new format pages is preferred immediately and required for due dates and submissions on or after January 25, 2022 (NOT-OD-21-110). This represents a change from the original May 25, 2021 requirement date for the updated formats and other support signatures. Applicants and recipients can use this time to align their systems and processes with the new formats and instructions. Failure to follow the appropriate formats on or after January 25, 2022 may cause NIH to withdraw applications from or delay consideration of funding.

Applicants and recipients remain responsible for disclosing all research endeavors regardless of the version of the forms used, including:

·       Supporting documentation, which includes copies of contracts, grants or any other agreement specific to senior/key personnel foreign appointments and/or employment with a foreign institution for all foreign activities and resources that are reported in Other Support. If the contracts, grants or other agreements are not in English, recipients must provide translated copies.

·       Immediate notification of undisclosed Other Support. When a recipient organization discovers that a PI or other Senior/Key personnel on an active NIH grant failed to disclose Other Support information outside of Just-in-Time or the RPPR, as applicable, the recipient must submit updated Other Support to the Grants Management Specialist named in the Notice of Award as soon as it becomes known.

See our Biosketch and Other Support pages for additional information.

 

 

Tags: 
Publication Date: 
05/06/2021

Why Properly Acknowledging NIH Support in Your Paper is Important

news

By Mike Lauer

Posted April 19, 2021

 

Imagine this scenario. In the hustle to publish a paper, you accidently forgot to cite the underlying NIH support. Or, the opposite, you opt to include that other grant in the acknowledgements that did not have anything to do with the work. No problem, right?

 

Well, it could be. Accurately and precisely acknowledging NIH funding allows us to properly assess award outputs and make recommendations for future research directions. It is also a term and condition of award outlined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement. Since the Stevens Amendment passed in 1989, recipients have been required to acknowledge federal funding when publicly communicating projects or programs funded with HHS funds.

 

NIH relies on proper acknowledgements to link publications to awards, and reviewers rely on it to help assess award productivity. Citing awards that did not directly support the work described in a paper adds to the burden on reviewers, who must then determine which grants were actually related to the reported research. In addition, Congress and the public may use this information to better understand progress resulting from the investment in biomedical research. Improperly citing awards not directly connected to the publication (over-citing) and failing to properly acknowledge NIH-funding on publications (under-citing) may also distort the true effect of NIH funding

 

So how does one determine when to acknowledge NIH awards on publications? Recipients should only acknowledge NIH awards on publications and other statements when:

 

·       The activities that contributed to that publication directly arise from the award and

·       are within the scope of the award being acknowledged

 

So, ask yourself, did the personnel activity supported by the award contribute to the publication? Did the authors consult with each other, help prepare the manuscript, conduct experiments, or analyze data reported in the paper? Is there a clear and apparent link between the work described in the publication with the aims and objectives of the grant? If so, then cite the appropriate NIH support.

 

In some cases, it may be difficult to identify which award(s) directly support a specific activity, especially in situations such as for large program projects with multiple components. We have FAQs on our Communicating and Acknowledging Federal Funding web page that may help, or  you can also consider reaching out to NIH program staff identified on the award notice for guidance.

 

We hope this information will help recipients better understand when to link federal dollar amounts to projects. By precisely and accurately acknowledging NIH awards in publications, we all help to ensure proper stewardship of taxpayer funds.

 

 

Tags: 
Publication Date: 
05/06/2021

Atlas of HIV's Targets in the Human Body Created

news
The paper “Characterization of HIV-induced remodeling reveals differences in infection susceptibility of memory CD4+ T cell subsets in vivo” was published in Cell Reports on April 27, 2021.
 
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI127219, R01AI147777, P01AI131374, and S10-RR028962), the amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research (109301), the UCSF-Gladstone Center for AIDS Research (P30AI027763), and the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust.
 
 
Tags: 
Publication Date: 
05/04/2021

Pages